Former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer Discusses Legal Pragmatism
Former Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer criticized the reversal of Roe v. Wade, stating it was driven by judges' personal beliefs rather than consideration of the law's broader context.
The reversal of Roe v. Wade is an example of a decision driven by judges' personal beliefs.
During a discussion at Harvard Law School, Breyer compared different methods of legal interpretation as part of a conference on judicial review.
- He spoke at a conference jointly hosted by the Harvard Law Review and Texas A&M University Center on the Structural Constitution.
- The event focused on judicial review and featured Breyer's insights on legal pragmatism.
Author's summary: Justice Breyer critiques Roe v. Wade reversal.
More News
- Charlies Stores Instagram Overview
- Read Customer Service Reviews of Charlie’s
- Canucks Live: Hughes to Philly? | Sherwood to Habs? | Hang the moral victory banner after loss to the Avs
- ‘Charlie's Angels’ reunite in powersuits on ‘The Drew Barrymore Show’
- [Erika Kirk insists husband Charlie’s murder was not a ‘gun problem’]
- Charlie's Angels Blu-ray 4K Ultra HD
- I was 16 when I collapsed and nearly died playing in front of a crowd including my mum
- Charlie B | Women’s Clothing & Fashion Trends
- 60,000 African penguins starved to death after sardine numbers collapsed – study
- Mediterranean restaurant, speakeasy to move into Spike & Charlie’s space