Supreme Court Declines to Hear Corner-Crossing Case
The Supreme Court declined to hear the corner-crossing case, which originated from four hunters from Missouri crossing a corner in Wyoming.
The case could have provided a final decision on who can access millions of acres of public land in the West, but the justices did not provide reasoning for declining to hear it.
According to the hunters' attorney, Ryan Semerad, corner crossing remains legal in states covered by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, including Oklahoma, Kansas, New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming, and Utah.
However, the issue remains a legal gray area in other parts of the country.
No reasoning was provided by the justices for declining to hear the case.
The decision means that the issue, which has been a point of contention in the public-land hunting community for years, is partially settled in the West.
Author's summary: Court declines corner-crossing case.
More News
- SiriusXM Bid to Drop Class Action Lawsuit Over Hidden Fees Fails - Radio World
- High winds across parts of Colorado create fire danger Monday
- A Big Auto Insurance Brand Conquers Spot Cable | Radio & Television Business Report
- A Secret Cameo and a Childhood Flashback - All the Changes Coming to Wicked: For Good
- Best Apple TV Original Shows of 2025
- Internet services cut for hours by Amazon cloud outage
- Apple Stock Powers the Dow After iPhone Sales, Bull Notes - Schaeffer's Investment Research
- Watch the NBA on ABC: See the 2025-2026 Season Schedule | ABC Updates
- Veteran actor Asrani passes away aged 84
- Reform in turmoil: Party forced to suspend 4 more Kent councillors after bitter infighting