Explaining The Polish Judge's Rationale
This explanation does not endorse the judge's logic, but rather aims to understand it, as it aligns with Polish state interests.
Judge Dariusz Lubowski ordered the release of the Nord Stream suspect, despite Germany's extradition demand due to alleged involvement in the attack.
Blowing up of critical infrastructure...during a just, defensive war...is not sabotage, but rather military actions...which under no circumstances can constitute crimes.
The judge questioned Germany's jurisdiction over international waters, stating that only Ukraine bears responsibility if it indeed ordered the attack.
Key Points:
- The judge's rationale is controversial and does not necessarily reflect a widely accepted view.
- Polish state interests appear to be a factor in the judge's decision.
Author's summary: Polish judge's rationale for not extraditing Nord Stream suspect explained.
More News
- Super Cup 2025 final: FC Goa retain title after beating East Bengal in penalty shootout
- East Bengal Face FC Goa In Super Cup Final
- Erika Kirk rejects gun violence root cause argument
- Charlie B | Women’s Clothing & Fashion Trends
- Rapala x Charlie's Fishing Limited Edition Super Shadow Rap Glide 11
- Charlies - Promo de ce jeudi Attention je n'ai que 7 lots 15 ...
- “Vegan McDonald’s” Mr Charlie’s To Open Two New San Diego Locations
- 60,000 African penguins starved to death after sardine numbers collapsed – study
- India vs Germany in Jr. Hockey WC semis; East Bengal vs FC Goa in Super Cup final: Indian Sports LIVE, December 7
- Mediterranean restaurant, speakeasy to move into Spike & Charlie’s space